Société de Courtage des Barreaux

I confirm: this company is a screen designed to lure the gogo. No law, no doctrine, no jurisprudence or no legal prerogative allows this company, which is not the insurer, which is not the Council of the lawyer implicated, nor the president, nor the president of the bâtonnier, nor a member of the Council of the Bar Association, to collect information covered by professional secrecy. In other words, this company is a third party that has no control over the elements of litigation between the client and his lawyer. However, this company does not hesitate to collect from the president or the lawyer implicated documents he holds from the client. It would be necessary once and for all to recall the case law: the third party who accepts the delivery of the information, whether it be an original document, a copy or even a transcription of its content, who reads it and holds it, and without even publicly revealing such information commits the offense of concealment of breach of professional secrecy punishable by 5 years 'imprisonment and a fine of € 375,000, up to 10 years' imprisonment and a fine of € 750,000 when the concealment is committed using the facilities provided by the exercise of a profession. QED

I confirm what has been said, do not deal with SCB, their purpose and slow you down, see let the limitation periods pass. If you are refused to give the name of the insurance policy (which is not the brokerage), act directly before the competent court.

scammers complicit with the lawyers

Message for Victims of Law Firms. the monopoly of representation by the companies of lawyers constitutes an impassable barrier for the litigants. By this monopoly the law firm always wins since you are in position of spectator and not actor of your file. . The caste of law firms will do everything so that your case never reaches the judge. The French constitution as well as the ECHR however mention the right to the judge for each litigant. The people demand free and equal justice for all. Article 4 of the law n ° 71-1130 of December 31, 1971 confers on the Companies of Lawyers a lucrative monopoly contrary to any form of justice. The Bar Brokerage Company is a company that serves lawyers and insurance companies. It is common ground that the insurer in defense is often the same for the various bars. The group Allianz, MMA, Etc ....... they. operate on the same principle not to compensate the victim. You are simply asking for the repeal of the representation of the monopoly of lawyers that is contrary to the constitution. Article 4 Law of 31 December 1971 not in accordance with the Constitution and international texts of the ECHR. The law of 31 December 1971 is contrary to all forms of justice and brings considerable sums of money to the companies of lawyers and insurance companies. As a result, Madam, sir, take action. Demand from the legislator the repeal of the end of the monopoly of representation by the companies of lawyers. This message will make them think!

Effectively the scb is there to discourage you, directly seize your lawyer without going through these people who are the right to stop you ... She makes opinions completely crazy, you out judgments that do not even find in the sites specialized, or her examples are student exercises, she gives you answers that have nothing to do with reality, in short they are just there to buy time, and try the watch, and well with me it is missed j have assigned the MMA ..... The MMA in my case is dragging in turn by not making the conclusions, (besides I do not see what he could answer apart from the pirouettes replied by this junk SCB) she received an injunction to conclude issued by the judge because the joke has lasted long enough. And yes it does not laugh anymore, they can not do anything, when the machine is launched.