Nobeoka Technical High School

I think it is very strange that the regulation of hairstyles that is only applied to boys is male discrimination. Freedom of expression is one of the reasons I think. Freedom of expression is guaranteed in the Japanese constitution, but the theory that hairstyles are a type of expression in recent years has led to the idea that restricting it is a violation of freedom of expression. Hair is not only growing to protect the head, but it is a self-expression that asserts "This is me" externally so that there are various forms such as shaved or shaved partly But I think there is. In that sense, hairstyle restrictions are a violation of freedom of expression. Second, it can be said that it is a violation of the right to equality. Limiting hairstyles for boys only places a burden on boys. In order to cut hair, you have to go to a beauty salon etc., and there is no such thing for girls, so it is a violation of property rights for boys and a violation of equal rights based on infringement of property rights. It can be said that there is. In addition, if you violate the school rules, I think that there will be some kind of instruction or a remorse written. However, the disposition must be taken "because it was born to a man", and even if the hair was long, it was not "if it happened to be a woman". It's funny to think that whether you were born as a man or a woman, you will have to be punished even if you do the same thing, or you won't. In some cases, it is permissible to make a difference in consideration of the difference between men and women, but in such a case, there is a good reason to make a difference, and it is necessary to be short for "male" regarding hairstyle regulation, "because it is a female" There is no reason to be long. Generally, men have short hair and women have long hair, but there are men and women with long hair and women with shaved hair, so it is strange to decide that the hairstyle should be this according to gender. Then, if you think about the three reasons you argue, all seem reasonable. First of all, regarding the point of not being "masculine", if there is a male figure that is said to be "masculine", is there anything against it? I think. In the first place, each person has a different sense of masculinity, so I think it's a matter of imposing the sense of value on individuals, but even if everyone shares that sense of value, it's a bad idea. Will not be. Now is the time when people aiming to be neutral, or so-called okamas, are dressed as women and appear on TV and are accepted. I feel that forcing men to be masculine is obsolete, and I can't find a justification for being masculine. It's exactly the same as your opinion about the next filth. If long hair is filthy in itself, many women are filthy, and if a man is filthy because he has long hair, it's nothing but male discrimination. .. Well, even if some people personally dislike long-haired men, it's a personal opinion, so it's not a mistake, but if you actually regulate the hairstyle of men for that reason, it is obvious male discrimination. .. For the reason that it is the third compulsory education, I think it is impossible to justify hairstyle regulation based on this. Certainly certain restrictions are allowed in the case law. However, it limits things such as hair dyeing and piercings that are considered to be likely to run poorly from the common sense of society, and it is simply the school's discretion to limit the hairstyle of students. I'm not saying that you should decide. Being limited because your parents don't have the responsibility doesn't mean that you have no responsibility for society and whether hairstyle restrictions are completely different issues. In high schools and universities, you can decide where to go based on your own free will, so even if there are some school rules and regulations in those high schools and universities, you consented to them and entered the school rules. I think it can be said that we must protect However, junior high school is a compulsory education, which is something that we must go to and we cannot decide where to go. Therefore, it is difficult to say that they agreed with the school rules, and I think there is a problem in making them obey the school rules because it is compulsory education. Students are property of the school and cannot be forgiven in any way. It may be a little confusing, but that's my idea.

Does it mean that two blocks are prohibited? Two-block is said to be unnecessary for academics, You say that you got sick from doing two blocks, you can't concentrate on your studies, and there are cases that are common cases such as incidents and accidents. Is there any such case? Rather, it is cleaner and more clean when cut up, and it was also two blocks when His Majesty the Emperor was in office. Japanese Does it mean that you are denying that the representative is doing it and prohibiting two blocks is also denying the Emperor's hairstyle? Are you prejudiced that you might fit the case? Do you see it as a bad hairstyle? Or do you want to destroy each individuality? Two blocks are OK at Nobeoka Gakuen. The old school rules of thinking Please review and think about it. That I just don't like great people Isn't it just forcing you to protect your students? ? Well, I guess the school doesn't know how much this opinion is.

It's really rough this year! I think it's a school like trash

it's the best. It is a wonderful school where the school style is free.

The students were very nice