Polikliniek Plastische Chirurgie

During an appointment of my partner with her plastic surgeon in The Hague, my two scars were also examined by her; after briefly giving her the background information, she advises me to ask for a referral from the doctor, because she can treat my (keloid) scars well with a Kenacort treatment. During the consultation with my doctor, he advises me to visit the outpatient clinic in Zoetermeer; she convinces me that they can be of service to me in the same way as the plastic surgeon in The Hague, since she too believes that such treatment is well applicable and necessary. During the appointment in Zoetermeer on 2 April 201, I provide the plastic surgeon (Zguricas) of this outpatient clinic with the same information and explain to her the route that I have already followed; she asks me to take off my shirt and stays behind her desk. It makes no attempt whatsoever to examine or examine the scars closely; after half a minute and from a meter away she concludes that nothing can be done about it, and she asks if I want to put on my shirt again. I do this in disbelief, hoping to get decisive information that shows that she can properly substantiate her position. She says she believes that there is not much that can be done about it, that some people suffer more from it than others, and that something can be done about it after at least a year or more, and therefore waiting . The fact that I have already been examined by a general practitioner and a plastic surgeon who has examined me before does not make her differ from her opinion, even if I ask her if she does not want to further examine the scars. The fact that I am telling her how she treated me, and she is very pretentious to state that this is what she thinks, testifies in my opinion to a specialist who does not want to see that her thinking and working methods can have a negative effect on patients . Such specialists are a disgrace to their profession if they do not want to improve themselves