Maksi-Plast

I suspect that they only write good reviews for themselves. I recommend to bypass this office. One balcony was flooded with the first rain, on the other all the blocks were mixed up - they did not do it as was in the order. Both the director and the installer came. The installer suggested not to swap the blocks, but to outweigh the flaps, and cover the remaining holes in the front of the profile with something! In the end, they promised to redo it, but they promised. Order windows elsewhere.

I express my deep gratitude to the staff of Maxi-Plast office 6, Gagarin Street 33 for the conscientious attitude to their work, for the high quality of the services rendered when installing the window, for attentive attitude to customers. I want to especially note the receiver Elena, the installers of Michael and Vladimir for their high professionalism. Thank you so much! Good health and good luck in everything. Yours faithfully Zakazchittsa Nyvert VN

For those who do not like to read, just look at the photo and say briefly - KEEP THIS COMPANY FAR more if you want to save your nerves and money and not get humiliated and disparaged! FOR THE OWNERS OF THIS FIRM PRIORITY IS MONEY, AND QUALITY AND ORDER OF CHARGE CONCEPTS !!! And for those who want to hear my story, listen: when I read the negative feedback on Flamp from some Jeanne, was on the alert, but then I read the comments of the management of the company PSK Maxi Plast and somehow believed them, because she herself, as the leader, did not once encounter consumer extremism . September 19, 2018 concluded a contract for the manufacture of a portal system (a window to the floor with a sliding door) with two-sided lamination, the amount of the contract is 141,000 rubles. Under the agreement, 80% paid on the day of signing the contract. The product was brought on the agreed date, 22.10.18, but could not be fully installed, it turned out that the most important thing is that the control system was a pen that did not come on time. We fixed the portal on some fasteners, so that the door did not fall out and left. 24.10.18 arrived and installed a pen. I inspected the product and photographed all the defects, scoring lamination to plastic, dents on the profile from poor-quality editing and much more, signed the act as a decent man, and all the defects indicated in the act. What am I to the fact that under the Treaty I have to pay the remaining 20% ​​on the day of signing the act. Naturally, if there are defects, then they must first be eliminated, and then paid, but I think only I, the opinion of the management of Maxi-Plast is different. We agreed to meet at the site, to inspect the portal and make a decision to remove comments. At the appointed time, a commission arrived in the structure of the General Director / Founder Kryzhinovsky Maxim Anatolyevich, the second founder of Miller Dmitry Alexandrovich and representatives of the company LLC Eurocat, which performs the lamination of products. After inspecting the defects, I was told that they can be removed only by dismantling the product and completely reworking the lamination and will take all this for about a month. But since the yard was at the end of October, and to remove a window measuring 2.8 mx 2.5 m, it means to unfreeze the house, of course it was necessary to look for another way out. A few days later, Kryzhinovskikh MA phoned me. and offered compensation in the amount of 10,000 rubles. I, in turn, offered to close this issue with the balances of my debts at a rate of 20% of the cost of the product, which was answered as follows: "To you and 10,000 rubles. then a lot, because there are no GOSTs for the manufactured product, and according to our specifications, these shoals can simply be painted over with the color of lamination. And if you decide to file a lawsuit against us, you will also get money, because you will have to pay for the work of our lawyers, so think carefully before writing a claim. " All this was voiced with such disdain and humiliation that the desire to conduct further negotiations was simply lost. For reference: according to the terms of the contract, all disagreements are resolved in court, at the location of the defendant. I think, it is not necessary to explain why this is done !! Attentively it is necessary to read the Contract! Yes, I wrote a claim and asked to reduce the cost of the product by 40%, which was received yesterday by the answer that when the founders left for the address, the indicated defects, which by the way are fixed in the photo and video, are allegedly not confirmed by the commission, and, therefore, my claims are groundless !!! But at the same time, I also remember to mention the balance of the unpaid amount of debt and the fact that I have to pay 0.5% of the amount of debt for each day of delay in payment. Dear sirs, the founders, the funds today are listed in your account, the more I do not owe you anything, you can rejoice at the realization that another client will "throw" you with impunity. Moreover, for today it was found out that the portal is installed not on a level. The conclusion, no matter how this firm will be called in the future, simply check the membership of the founders on the IFTS website, and if you see the names of Maksim Kryzhinovsky, Dmitry Miller, Dmitri Alexandrovich Miller, Eduard Vladimirovich Sinyavin, and remember - the fish is rotting from the head ......!

A good window firm, intelligent managers, quality windows, excellent installers.