Hsinchu District Prosecutors Office

Nice view❤️from top 😍

Hi can i ask questions

He and I go for a walk here~

In addition to using their powers to collude with lawyers to contract criminal evidence, prosecutors at the Hsinchu District Public Prosecutor's Office are also good at arguing. In January 1992, I sorted out the relics that my father had handed over in newspaper packages many times during his lifetime and reminded me to keep it carefully. I found that lawyer Wang Zhiyang sent it to his father by registered letter No. 0407 on April 7, 1989. The property distribution letter dated October 19, 1988 was 3 pages in A4 format, and the second page Wang Zhiyang deliberately replaced the second page of the A4 format property distribution letter dated May 23, 1988, so there was the sixth page of the property distribution letter dated May 23, 1988. Article records. It is different from the content of the three-page property distribution letter in A4 format on October 19, 1988 when I accompanied my father to Wang Zhiyang Law Firm to prepare the property distribution letter on October 19, 1988. It was issued on January 14, 1992. Lawyer Wang Zhiyang filed a forgery document. Prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu immediately opened a court session on January 24, 1992, and ordered our court to submit a letter to his father to receive the property distribution letter from lawyer Wang Zhiyang, which is the first property distribution statement contained in the indictment. At the same time, he ordered our court to submit a submission on October 19, 88 The three-page property distribution letter in A4 format obtained from Wang Zhiyang Law Firm on October 19, 1988 is the second property distribution letter contained in the indictment. According to the District Prosecutor’s Office at 3:50 pm on January 28, 1999, the other case of Yonggu Hezi No. 2099 in 1998 was investigated and verified. Prosecutor Fu Yijun read out and reminded the two copies of the same content and no staples. Kong Jinzhi, October 19, 1988, B4 format, 2-page property distribution letter, on which the prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu wrote the first property distribution book and the second property distribution book in pencil, and the first property distribution book was covered with Hsinchu One blue oval seizure seal of the District Court. The property distribution statement presented by Prosecutor Fu Yijun and the first and second property distribution statements on the first line of page 5 of the indictment are three pages that do not match the position of the staple hole, which is obviously different, and the property presented by Prosecutor Fu Yijun The distribution letter does not contain the contents of Article 6 of the property distribution letter of May 23, 1988 contained in the ninth line on page 2 to the fifth line on page 3 of the indictment. Moreover, the property distribution statement presented by Prosecutor Fu Yijun is the same as the property distribution statement produced by his father at Wang Zhiyang Law Firm on October 19, 1988, and the property distribution statement signed, sealed and fingerprinted by all fathers of Wang Zhiyang Affairs is the same, confirm In order to prevent me from telling Wang Zhiyang about the forgery document, Wang Zhiyang was not subject to judicial prosecution. He replied to frame me with false accusation, used his power to collude with Wang Zhiyang, and at the same time compromised the criminal evidence of the forgery document that I told Wang Zhiyang, namely the first property distribution letter, and confession. The evidence to be compared is the second property distribution letter. As a prosecutor, Zhan Zhaoshu was so incompetent that he turned the first property distribution book into a two-page property distribution book in B4 format on October 10, 1988 with exactly the same format, number of pages and content as the second property distribution book. Quan sue me for false accusation. I received a letter from the Prefectural Prosecutor’s Office dated July 20, 1993 from Zhujian Yundu Ninety-three Zhibao 137 Zi No. 15179, and returned the false accusation. October 19, 1988, B4 format, 2-page property distribution letter On the last line of the second page, there are 3 red stamps of the title of Judge Feng Junlang dated June 4, 1992. It was found that Judge Feng Junlang used his power to collude with lawyer Wang Zhiyang to complete the contract outside the court. The distribution letter is a notice of malfeasance and forgery to Judge Feng Junlang. At 2:30 pm on January 20, 1995, the Prefectural Procuratorate's case concerning the other cause of the case of Pugu Hezi No. 2055 in 1994 was inquired by the Public Prosecutor. Prosecutor: You are so brave enough to sue the judge to drop the criminal evidence. If you can't produce definitive evidence, you will be taken into custody immediately. Ordered my court to open a letter from the District Prosecutor’s Office and said that he was very active in handling the case. He would immediately check the indictment and the verdict, and set a court session at the same time next week. If I were not in court by then, I would absconded in fear of crime. He immediately ordered him wanted. About half an hour, the prosecutor called me on my cell phone and said: Originally scheduled to be cancelled by the court hearing next week, he has been ordered to hand over the transfer case and is going through the handover procedure. I immediately asked: Is there a check between the indictment and the verdict to confirm that Judge Feng Junlang has dropped the criminal evidence? Prosecutor: Yes, the superior explained that the facts of the case could not be disclosed. He was inconvenient to talk and immediately hung up. The prosecutors and prosecutors of the second investigation office are like revolving lanterns. Finally, the prosecutor Fu Yijun of 1998 He Zi No. 2099 investigates. During the hearing, two bailiffs stood on both sides of me. The door of the investigation room was not closed, and a bailiff was clearly seen walking back and forth. Prosecutor Fu Yijun asked about his age information and said: Mr. Cai, you tell Judge Feng Junlang to drop criminal exhibits and commit dereliction of duty and forge documents. If you are willing to withdraw the notice, it will be deemed that nothing happened, and she will not investigate or pursue it. If he refuses to withdraw his notice, he will be taken into custody in court. I immediately said: Judge Feng Junlang used his power to collude with lawyer Wang Zhiyang to complete the criminal evidence that I sued Wang Zhiyang for forging documents outside the court. I am determined not to withdraw the complaint. Please handle it in accordance with the law. Prosecutor Fu Yijun slapped hard on the table and called up the volume: What did you say? You say it again. I repeat it again. Prosecutor Fu Yijun waved his hand and said: You can go home. This is the prosecutor's use of intimidation to ask people to withdraw the notice. On January 28, 1999, at the court of inspection and verification, I repeatedly repeated that Judge Feng Junlang dropped the criminal evidence and requested Prosecutor Fu Yijun to handle it in accordance with the law. Prosecutor Fu Yijun committed dereliction of duty and forged documents in order to protect Judge Feng Junlang from contracting criminal exhibits. On April 6, 1999, Zhu Jian Guoyong 98 He was 2099 letter No. 09488 page 2 deliberately fabricated me and sued Judge Feng Junlang. Modified the format, and refused to explain how the content of the 3-page property distribution letter in A4 format on October 19, 1988, which was not continuous, was changed into a 2-page property distribution letter in B4 format on October 19, 1988 that was consistent in content. This was signed by the District Prosecutor's Office in order to cover up other people's crimes and wantonly fabricated false facts. Prosecutor Hou Shaoqing of the District Public Prosecutor’s Office knowingly the District Public Prosecutor’s Office dated July 20, 1993, Zhu Jian Yundu 93 issued a letter No. 15179 for 137 characters, and the prosecutor returned me to falsely accuse the seized objects in the case. October 19, 1988, B4 format 2 pages The property distribution book, at the end of the second page, there are three red stamps of Judge Feng Junlang dated June 4, 1992. Judge Feng Junlang used his power to collude with lawyer Wang Zhiyang to complete the criminal evidence of forging documents from me against Wang Zhiyang outside the court. , In collusion with prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu, lawyer Wang Zhiyang, and at the same time subcontracted the criminal evidence that I sued Wang Zhiyang for forging documents and the evidence of the confession comparison was not connected. Also, Prosecutor Hou Shaoqing knew that in the investigation and verification court, Prosecutor Fu Yijun read out and reminded two copies of the same content on October 19, 1988, B4 format 2-page property distribution letter, on which Prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu wrote the first in pencil. The property distribution statement and the second property distribution statement. The first property distribution statement is also covered with a blue oval seizure seal of the Hsinchu District Court. This is when prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu used his power to collude with lawyer Wang Zhiyang, and at the same time, I sue Wang Zhiyang for forging documents. The criminal evidence and confession are like mountains of iron evidence. Prosecutor Hou Shaoqing used his power to obtain evidence of Judge Feng Junlang’s crimes in order to cover up the criminal evidence, and found that there were three red stamps of Judge Feng Junlang dated June 4, 1992. Then, using the convenience of the prosecutor, Yu Feng Judge Toshiro’s crime evidence was processed and covered with 3 blue confiscated seals of the prefectural prosecutor’s office, deceiving prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu in a mixed manner that he did not drop the criminal evidence, which is a common method used by prosecutors. According to the Prefectural Procuratorate’s May 28, 1999, Zhujian Guozhi 99 He 184 Zi No. 15344, page 3, line 10 stated: After reviewing the Office’s 1993 Bao Bao Zi No. 137 file, volume 93 The first property law distribution letter attached to the letter No. 15179 of Zhujian Yundu 93 Implementation Insurance No. 15179 on July 20, 2005 is in B4 format and a total of 2 papers (a total of 4 pages on the front and back after folding, but page 4 is blank) , And pages 1 to 3 are respectively covered with a blue confiscation seal of the Department, and the inspection result of the prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu: the paper of the third page of the first property distribution book is very different from the first and second pages. There is no difference in the position of the staple hole. Moreover, the photocopy of the property distribution book attached to Exhibit 3 in the report letter recognized by the platform is the property distribution book after the package was dropped. However, the photocopy of the property distribution book attached to the exhibit 3 should be the first that has not been altered or replaced. 2. The photocopy of the property distribution book is based on the fact that Zhan Zhaoshu's censorship recognized that the second page of the first property distribution book was dropped. It should be unfounded. Hou Shaoqing's long story is unclear. In addition, the prosecutors were involved in the case. Attorney Wang Zhiyang was able to collude with prosecutors Zhan Zhaoshu, judges Feng Junlang, Wang Wenying, and Cai Xinyi to subdue criminal evidence, and they could give false evidence. The Hsinchu District Procuratorate did not dare and could not summon or arrest Wang Zhiyang. In the investigation of the case, Wang Zhiyang is the only and most powerful ace barrister in Taiwan, which will be explained in the Hsinchu summary court review.

Hello there; Brain wave instrument directional horn It is a device called brain control and has a sound, which can transmit sound and images through the device. Science and medicine say it is a controlled product. I want to ask the inspection unit or the police unit Whether there are similar appliances, Both the Bureau of Investigation and the police department responded Going to the psychiatric department is usually called thinking, In fact, some people are just being rectified. From media articles Directional conduction ultrasound Products researched by the Industrial Technology Research Institute, Are brainwave instruments and finger-like horns used by the investigation team of the police criminal team? They are used to detect drugs, firearms and fraud cases, which are similar to polygraph instruments, which emit sound sources to produce a chain reaction. It is a kind of sound source that can be selected by the target object. Non-target persons cannot hear even if they are beside the target object. I also suspect that a similar device was used, The feeling of being used will be similar to the hallucinations, and you will not see the machine, This kind of device will also make you feel painful and electric shock can make you dream more dreams And seeing some images, After being used for about three years, it will interfere with your life from time to time and make you unable to fall asleep. The most common time to reach twenty days is no use taking sleeping pills. I have also received calls from friends, family, or without numbers, but I asked my friends to confirm, It’s not that he himself is using a device to send a friend’s voice to your brain waves, making you think you have received a call from someone you know. They claim to be the Bureau of Investigation, and the police Facebook is Yang Shanjin, Zhao Wuqi, the third group of the Hsinchu third branch investigation team, Yang Yuqing has a family named (Crystal and Yang Wei'an and Yang Menglun) (Chen Jiaqi and Meng Xuanyi) The address is the Art Palace, Lane 57, Lane 271, Wuling Road, Hsinchu City Liu Zhehong, Hong Xiangzhi, Yao Changyan and the person driving a 6381-RU, I was using brainwave equipment to investigate whether the State Guest Yadong Electric Playground is a gambling game. Chen X Yi, a woman surnamed Wei and Zhao X Long, Yang Shanming, whether King Penang owns guns and sells first- and second-level drugs and underground balls, etc. Wu Qiuyu, former city councillor Wu Guobao, city councilor Wu Xiwen’s home business Xiangyisheng scaffolding project is closed to lobbying, The response was reported to the unit of the Police and Political Affairs Department, so I was unable to close my eyes for 20 days. It affects my life from time to time, causing the body’s immune system to be affected. It is diagnosed by the doctor as a rare disease and constitution, cancer symptoms, I don’t want to cooperate with them to prove these things. These people have nothing to do with me, and there is no way to file a report. People who use this kind of equipment arrogantly told me through their brain waves that using this kind of equipment will not leave any real evidence. They have tried vegetatives to deal with their friends’ mothers asking about the family’s inheritance, which forced them to Suicide or going to a doctor’s psychiatric response is useless. It’s a great public authority. The response to the police department said that there is now a capital law and there is no definite evidence, The police’s concept of jurisdiction is very strong and they cannot cross the district to file for the record. If the police use this device privately, it will be a serious violation of power and public power. The response to the Xindian Bureau of Investigation, the General Bureau or a higher unit, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ministry of Justice of the National Security Bureau, has nothing to do with it. I would like to ask whether the scientific and medical units have more specific information on such devices that can prove that the investigation and investigation units have similar devices and abuse them.