Kharkov State Academy of Culture

need to make repairs 😏

Kharkiv State Academy of Culture. Nice place to study at!

He studied at this educational institution from 2012 to 2014 at the Faculty of Cultural Studies, but nothing has changed there so far. Then he moved to another, more prestigious university (which I do not want to mention here, so that they would not think that this is an advertising review). I must say right away - the review will be negative. 1) A lot of material, but not effective. I can say that in another educational institution I learned more useful over a semester than at the Academy in two years. Requirements are a separate issue: in 2012, in the first year, we were initially told that we had to write a term paper of 45 pages, and even tried to force us to do this by hand. But the benefit of the matter was later revised. Despite the fact that in the university where I moved later, the coursework was half as much. I moved to the faculty of cultural studies at another university and there the material was really culturological. The academy has a lot of extra items. 2) Teachers - how lucky. There are good, intelligent people (who are also spent), whose couples are nice to walk on. But there are those who, frankly, sharply communicate with students, make inadequate requirements, it is considered normal for them to raise their voice for a student, and such trifles as just closing your eyes while a couple (why are you sleeping, will be at home) and everything like that. The department of history was especially distinguished by this in my memory. I am already silent about what is normally considered to be poking at 20-year-old boys and girls. During the exams, the teacher may simply not come for a consultation, and the department will say the phrase: he owes you nothing. There are also those who turn lectures into conversations about politics and the weather, while sometimes doing this is very incorrect. In general - schoolchildren and soviet council. In my memory, two teachers in Ukrainian left. 3) The conditions are just terrible - the repair is so-so, under the desks, there’s a lot of chewing gum since the 90s. They don’t practically clean - students wipe the board on their own, practically do not clean under the desks. The toilet is generally silent. Some of the audiences are Papa Carlo’s lockers. I studied for a year in an audience where the window was at the back - i.e. it seemed like you were in a cell with no windows. There is also a self-service canteen, burnt cutlets and apprentice cooks. 4) Student life: it simply does not exist. Balls and discos - what are you. Instead, lectures on the dangers of smoking and alcohol from an organization more like a sect. There were also skits, scenes from theater-goers and something else special. The Academy of Culture is a very politicized place - they even had a rally when students and teachers under the lenses of local television cameras on the background of their buildings without repair started shouting slogans "for Ukraine" and it was all called a flash mob. They are more interested in politics than science, as it seemed to me. There was a beauty contest in which a girl from my group participated, where she won a 15 percent discount in a sushi bar. 5) Contingent - well, how lucky. The staff is different, I was even less fortunate, but in other faculties - quiet horror. Maybe the new generation will be better than their predecessors. But in such an atmosphere everyone there goes some kind of “frightened”. Still: when you are standing on the stairs, and they say to you: move away, otherwise right now the evil aunt username will come and will KEEP you, then you already think whether this is the case with this place. There is a local eavesdropping, where they discuss the personal lives of teachers, why the toilet doors in the feces, all sorts of vulgarity, etc. There really is nothing more to discuss ... 6) In my memory there were no bribes, but there really is nothing to pay for! But it seems to me that some teachers underestimated my grades, since moving to another university, my rating grew and I became an excellent pupil - and there I was just a good-looking student with fours. By the way, in that new university I received a red diploma, but I did not shine at the KhGAK. There, in general, no matter how you study, not everyone will notice. In general, do not go there if you do not want to lose time in vain. I do not advise anyone. Even for a crust.

Recently, together with my colleagues, colleagues from the Faculty of Management and Business, I held a round table on the topic of qualification of future graduates of our faculty, invited guests - owners of travel agencies in the city of Kharkiv, who spoke in detail about the need to pay attention to teachers , so that students have practical skills in working in the Turkish field after graduation. Therefore, I would like to express our gratitude to our leader Anischenko Alli Petrovni for his assistance in organizing and conducting the event and support in any other case.

I would like to share my experiences here at the Faculty of Tourism. We have changed a lot of teachers throughout my student life, and each of them has a great approach to learning. I would especially like to single out Yariko Miroslav. She always has interesting lectures, an unusual approach to holding, constantly new and cool Ideas that we put into practice with her. This is the kind of teacher that everyone goes to with pleasure to learn something new every time. I thank the academy for such a teacher.