Mag. Alexander Wolkerstorfer

Very unprofessional and no apology whatsoever until now.

This person is not anwallt..he is a defraud.a reason a man buys. The new owner makes a notice of private land park ban. But about the old owner not about his name..and how this handicapped anwallt takes everything. Sends the people 187 € straffe..Mr numbers. An onwallt can think that he does illegal things. No pity no brain

Unfortunately he has developed into a bad lawyer since 2014, so my experience. He no longer does what the client wants! E.g. Did the judge do what was sufficient when submitting the evidence and returned the additional evidence. For others, the judge asked for further evidence that was also brought after (which then also fit) but for one point the judge wrote in the judgment I couldn't prove it !! The Ra did not want to include this in the revision, although in my opinion it is a legal question. What if a judge at the hearing does what if the evidence presented is sufficiently proven and turns the whole thing around in the judgment! (A judge has to say if he wants further evidence. You can't have every piece of evidence e.g. notarized or confirmed by an expert opinion.) (I was deprived of this legal information, but I should already pay it for the most important point of the appeal) In this case, the verdict was only received by email 12 days after it had been received by the Ra. (and it was not a reason for vacation) You have to teach the Ra about the law again and again! “Dear Mr. Wimmer! Due to the low value in dispute of € 3,127.20, a revision is in any case not permitted. " * § 502 ZPO However, the appeal is in any case permitted if the subject of the dispute on which the appellate court has decided (subject of the decision) in money or monetary value exceeds a total of 5,000 euros. * Then he wrote a letter on the last day, although we had the agreement that I always look through the documents, release them. But in that case it was also the case that I only received the document by mail one day after the deadline. Doesn't stick to agreements! even the Supreme Court writes "The appeal is rejected (by the opponent) The plaintiff has in his appeal answer only stated that the revision was not justified; on the He did not point out the inadmissibility. His The revision answer was therefore not used appropriate legal defense. I read from it a deficient representation. I almost forgot that now his secretary asked me several times why I did not become a lawyer because I am more legally familiar with the Mag. (I only have an apprenticeship with a master's degree) I am very disappointed with him and his behavior! And info there should only be the word attorney's liability. Answer to his comments At that time I also believed in legal liability. And that you have a spark. If it is found that you have made a mistake, legal representation has been inadequate. Ignorance combined with greed for money And for all readers you won't find a lawyer who helps you against a lawyer because the judgment of the Supreme Court doesn't help either !! So think carefully about which lawyer you go to and want to get legal advice elsewhere.

Will be displayed by us at the Upper Austrian Bar Association! Your client has lost and did not really stand a chance with them as a lawyer so save the stupid device. So sad!