XXmaps.com

Map
Detailed Information
Photos
II. Internal Gastroenterology
II. Internal Gastroenterology
II. Internal Gastroenterology
II. Internal Gastroenterology
II. Internal Gastroenterology
II. Internal Gastroenterology
Reviews
Petr Žádník (05/23/2017)
Care in an otherwise modern, nice facility on average to below average. The approach to patients varies widely. The cooperation of the clinic with other clinics of the hospital is rather a rivalry between them. Specifically, at the request of the patient to the nurse was the answer: "I do not want to go home at six" and it was only 17.30 h. Another example. The wife introduced enteral nutrition by gavage into the stomach for two months instead of the small intestine. They claimed that it was found in the small intestine but in another workplace by ultrasound that it was really only in the stomach. This has damaged her digestion for a long time. In addition, they were horrified at the neurological clinic that they had this nutrition for so long that it was used for a maximum of 14 days. Sometimes a tactless approach to patients in communicating diagnosis and treatment. Frequent interest in the patient only formal. They are more concerned with teaching medical students than patients. Next time we refuse treatment at this workplace.
St Marks (12/13/2018)
Behavior and expertise of sister staff in particular, long waiting times, need for frequent transfers for individual examinations ...
Similar place