CaixaBank

Former employee of this office (Fernando) Obsessed with selling any insurance to clients. Continuous calls, incessant offering Insurance, he took advantage of the minimum possibility of communication with people to achieve his goal if he was not able to achieve it himself. He had had no luck with us, he had always been denied any insurance purchase and this would have made him react differently until he achieved one more sale using cheating as he has done with me.nSigning in Digital on the Tablet meant in my case information contrary to what years later would be printed by the Central. That's when I saw what he really was, his way of working, the evil used to sell Insurance led him to hook the client in this way without him knowing anything. It is incredible everything he has manipulated and in front of me, on the table in front of him. Who would have thought that he would check boxes without my consent or knowledge in the insurance documentation (according to him) that it was mandatory to do so.nPeople have trusted him while serving in this office, it has been too late to see the deception that he has particularly done. He marked boxes on the Tablet when it was not to do so, then what he gives to the client in front of him is a hole to sign, so that in principle he was not mistrusted. What Fernando was not saying at that time, is everything that he was filling in on the computer since the client only signs on the screen of the tablet, that's how he worked. I have been disappointed with these awesome people.nTrusting that man has been a very big mistake by many. Others do not even know that they possibly have some (Mandatory Insurance for Fernando) so to speak but in reality it is not mandatory at all and despite this they are paying month after month for absolutely nothing.nWhat he has done is reportable, to know how many he has done the same. For me, this office and La Caixa itself have been totally null and void and without any credibility.nYou have to have control over people who have also been in the same position for years. They are really the most likely to carry out this type of deception because they consider that there is no surveillance over their work.nIt is a shame to have had an account with these people. The Director who worked with him at that time I do not know if he had any knowledge about this, about his peculiar way of working without the consent of the owner, and I doubt not. It is to doubt even that there was not an exhaustive control with this man.nAt the cost of everything, people are not fooled.nOn the basis of any personal circumstance for his own benefit, he does not give reason to hook people who live honestly thus to treason.