Specialized school №296

When I was studying (about 5 years ago), the school, in principle, was not bad, but there are a couple of but ... (let's start with the bad) 1. Ukrainian literature was very hardcore, for those who are not humanities it is difficult to get a score higher than 7, but much easier to get lower; 2. Policy regarding English - children were divided (may and continue to be divided) into three groups depending on their knowledge of English. In principle, there was not much difference between how they teach at the "low" (I was at it) and the "intermediate" level, probably I was lucky with the teacher. But on the "high" everything is radically different (well, the spoken word will certainly be much better + all sorts of goodies). And now everything seems to be correct, but just go to a higher level is almost impossible. In addition, there was a restriction on balls. Type if you had n points upon admission / transfer, then you cannot get more than n + m (I don’t remember 2 or 3 points) (for me there was a limit of 8 points) - a very good incentive to "study" for an average statistical student; 3. There were (maybe still are) teachers who are quite good at undermining successes (not only by assessment but also by words). Let's just say that once I had success in biology 11-12 points + I had to participate in the Olympiad: /. And now one replacement was enough not only to get 2 - in biology, but also to discourage interest in the subject and the desire to participate in the Olympiad. 4. I saw a review about toilets. I can say, God save these toilets, because f * ches some individuals (schoolchildren) are not busy, every year some sort of "sabotage" was arranged. 5. We also had German at school, the group was divided into two subgroups at random - which, in principle, is not bad. And my lucky one changed teachers every year - 1 year is a kind teacher (all have strengthened the foundations) - 2 years are average in strictness teacher (more deeply ALL studied German + 50% of the subject passed only German) - 3 years of strict teacher - 90% of the subject was strictly in German, EVERYONE was supposed to, and most importantly, they could speak German - no one had a grade below 9, usually 10 and above. At that time my level of German was very high - I could safely go to Germany without knowing English. But the next year we again had a kind teacher - well, and the level began to slowly drop - So teachers need to be strict by the 9th grade and older. I can only say if we were taught English as it happened with German (1-3 years, not necessarily with a change of teacher) it would be much better: ((, and not this is a system of distribution to levels (where the idea is clear in principle, and there is no implementation - to rise above is almost unrealistic, and for some it is impossible - the shackles of the constraint n + m). 6. I would also like to add about mathematics. When I was studying, I noticed that teachers (well, at least two for sure) have a different approach to teaching mathematics and for some students one approach is better for others worse. And if you have problems with mathematics, as an option, you can try to move to another group where there is another teacher. I was lucky the main teacher approached me, and not who were not very good, but when there was a replacement, their level in metamathematics went up. 7. Well, maybe something else, but I lost the incentive to write further. Well, from the biggest advantages, I can add that the exact sciences teachers and our class teacher who taught "Foreign Literature" are trying to distribute students, so that a student with better knowledge would sit with a student who knows less and it turned out that one was pulled up the knowledge of the other, well, at the same time, their own too (there is no better way to strengthen your knowledge than to teach another) + more often all the girls were put to the boys (so that they would talk less in class) but not always, though there is a minus, sometimes this system works too well)) and you can stay behind your neighbor and a little competition appears between you (at some point it may already start to enrage).

Graduates of 2000 are the last homework and class work. ☆☆☆☆☆ The most precious memories. IMF bottom, hole, still school for rent classes survives. Mustang ponts for elementary school ... Modern authorities for you this school is god compared to yours level 2021 you at once. What is still missing teachers ?! Negative reviews of tiki from unrealized selfish cheap pimps.

Okay, good school. Good teachers, Yes Good kids. Very big schoolboy Lots of space !! )

I graduated from school in 2018. I had excellent teachers of Ukrainian, English, biology, foreign and Ukrainian literature, history and law. I am very grateful to all teachers, especially Beregova NS, Vakhnenko OI, Grekova OV, Reutskaya TG, Savycheva AO)))

Not a school but a legend I bet 10/10 especially the best teachers Lisovaya O.V., Vakhnenko E.I., Palko V.V. English 5 times a week, you can die, but English norms. Renovation is ok too, just make normal toilets