Sozialgericht Hamburg

Not neutral and completely overwhelmed. The defendant authority cannot find a file, which is why I, as the plaintiff, are advised to drop the case. The file is believed to be lost to this day and would almost certainly have confirmed my version of the story.

I would like to thank the social court judge very much for saving me by acknowledging my existence problems and representing the job center with great commitment. Zieminska

The Hamburg Social Court was in the 15th Senate on 8/28/20 from 9 a.m. to 3:38 p.m. NOT tel. reachable, PERMANENT "occupied". In the letters of v. SG Hamburg referred to a "citizen phone", but the SG itself MUST be directly contactable for every plaintiff. I have NOT been able to contact the 15th Senate by phone for weeks. For me the QUESTION arises whether the SG Hamburg m.E. Does NOT want to be reachable for disabled claimants like us? As it is according to VwGO, SGG regulation and Art. 97 GG, court neutrality; since not all plaintiffs live in Hamburg, not all plaintiffs are healthy and can go there, which means e.g. we disabled plaintiffs in conviction. of paragraph 7 BGG by SG Hamburg or its telephone NOT-accessibility were EXTREMELY disadvantaged in order to, in my opinion, to be forced, like us, to drive to the post office because the SG could not be reached by phone in the 15th Senate, the "Citizen's Telephone" or the switchboard, or email in the 15th Senate, or fax, fax always busy, telephone connection . are PERMANENTly occupied in the 15th Senate; or in my opinion be forced to drive there directly - and that in Corona times so that disabled people get even more sick instead of being allowed to operate "low-contact communication" with the SG? or: have to call in a lawyer kostspieli? Where is the m.E. Equal rights according to Art. 3 GG? Which the SG Hamburg would also have to provide to disabled claimants like us - in the sense of BARRIER-FREE contact? Let us know your e-mail, as we as disabled plaintiffs do not, in my opinion, it is necessary to send letters that do not arrive until 3-4 weeks later, with the risk of corona contamination in post offices + expensive to damage the plaintiff, and / or to appoint a lawyer! So far, we disabled plaintiffs have ONLY had NEGATIVE experiences in the proceedings of the Hamburg Social Court through my opinion. Hearing impairment of the legal hearing. We can NOT recommend the SG Hamburg to DISABLED claimants, because in my opinion NO consideration for us seriously ill, poor plaintiffs was taken by m.E. healthy high earners SG judges with the salary group m.E. R1-R3 with approx. € 5000-8600 MONTHLY, cf. Kienbaum study and on Wikipedia under "salary" the m.E. are not even reachable by phone for us through their secretaries!

Here a decision is made against a plaintiff = socially weak person, the social court in most cases only represents the interests of the health insurance company, 👩‍💻👩‍💻 pension insurance companies and the employment office; they also look for mistakes in the plaintiff and mistakes are overlooked or left out in the defendant ’ Right remains wrong - from the point of view of the plaintiff.

You can forget this social dish! Hang under the covers with the job center, even if the case is clear. The situation is not viewed neutrally, but rather listens to the opinion of the job center. If you want to go here without a lawyer, you can forget it directly. I have not had any money for weeks because I am in training and pay the rent from my salary. They did not consider urgent proceedings to be necessary. And there is no other help either.