Landgericht Frankenthal

Despite Corona friendly and helpful employees. The court's legal statements were conclusive and understandable. The duration of the procedure could be accelerated therefore only 4 stars.

Arbitrary justice Already under the previous president it came among other things. In the case of bias requests for curious judgments, judgments were made in spite of the existing bias request and this was subsequently approved by the President and other courts. Now it should be noted that the “scam” of being embarrassed about money here - which is recorded in the Rhineland-Palatinate courts - continues. Work is deliberately sloppy here - so that the rebellious citizen who actually goes the possible way through the complaint - to correct a more than obviously incorrect processing - is stifled, even punished monitarily. We seem to act here - and those affected should please contact the appropriate human rights organizations urgently - to act as a systematic gang-like approach that urgently needs an external review. The work is so sloppy that, among other things, tries to pull through expropriations on completely outdated, unchecked data and an interaction takes place here that should urgently be checked by the public prosecutor's office. Unfortunately, an “in-house” check is not automatically expected to be free of prejudice. When will this circumstance finally be eliminated in which there are transnational instances to which this misconduct can be reported and checked? Therefore, contact human rights organizations - urgently!

Just misjudgments

Everything was quick

No good teacher training. Some CEOs are mainly busy to give their anecdotes to the best, besides I have been assigned in succession to a total of three trainers, the last of which was after all great. Nevertheless: How should I take my training seriously if not even a trainer can be found?